The Professional Development Dilemma

Posted by Tim Landeck on September 27, 2011

All K-12 employees need to receive professional development in their field. Teachers need to learn about new and better ways to deliver instruction. Classified staff needs to learn about the new programs and district initiatives. Administrators need to learn about ways to manage their staff and facility in a more effective and efficient manner. Technical staff needs to learn about the new technology developments to select and implement the systems that will assist in making everyone’s life easier and more effective in education.

Can any of these job areas do without their trainings and if so, for how long? When will the lack of funding to support forward movement in professional development be felt by the students and community? It seems that professional development funds are usually cut soon after the funding for the district grant writer. In other words, it is one of the first items cut from the budget.

In these lean times in education the technical staff is faced with a large dilemma.  We need to keep up with the latest and greatest in technology for the K-12 arena; however, there are not funds available to send staff to trainings where they learn about ways to do more with less and improve the technical workings of the school site, district or county. These individuals are already highly skilled and trained personnel but we need to keep them this way. With limited, or no professional development funds available, how can we keep our staff up to speed with the ever changing world of technology?

The technology staff is expected to integrate the latest technical innovations as they are released.  It seems to me that the technical staff’s lack of continued professional growth would be felt sooner by their “clients” than the other groups. Everyone needs to continue to grow and model being lifelong learners, but when we cut the training to the technical staff, there is no opportunity for growth in the technical department and this equates to stagnant progress that affects everyone in the organization, from staff to students to community members.

Facebooktwittergoogle_plusredditpinterestlinkedintumblr

Published by

Tim Landeck

Tim Landeck is Technology Director at Pajaro Valley Unified School District and a member of the TICAL Cadre.

2 thoughts on “The Professional Development Dilemma”

  1. Tim, could not agree more. When funding for training gets cut at the technical support level, then those expensive new technology tools go unused because no one knows how to effectively implement them with their students. And when they go unused then the public sees us as being only effective on one level: wasting their money. Nice article and a true problem with no clear solution in our future.

  2. Tim, In Murrieta we have developed some online professional development for staff members. This helps in two ways, the first being teachers and staff experiencing online learning as we move towards more online classes for students and the second is the savings from not having to get everyone together at the same time and place.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *