Posts Tagged ‘teaching’

View teaching through a new lens—literally!

March 31st, 2010 by Stephen Vaughn

What’s quality teaching?  Depends on your point of view.  When you ask a teacher, “Are you doing a good job?” they answer, naturally, through their filter of reality.  Ask me the same question and I’ll do the same thing: answer through my own filter.  We all do this; that is the point.  To determine the true answer to the quality question for teaching, or any performance-oriented occupation, we need another point of view, a different perspective.

A video camera is the best different perspective.  Historically, we have depended on other humans—principals, supervisors, peer coaches and the like—to provide the different perspective.  One problem with this solution is that our perspectives are filtered by past experience and prejudice.  Research has proven that eye witnesses are not very reliable because everyone “sees” what they have been trained to see.

Another problem with human observers is that their presence has an effect on the environment in which they are observing. It is hard for an outside observer to become unobtrusive, let along invisible.  The small, digital cameras of today, however, can disappear quite easily.

Wait a minute!  Am I suggesting we put cameras in classrooms? The answer is yes, but not in the Vegas camera-in-the ceiling, pervasive manner (though that’s an interesting topic for another blog!).   I’m suggesting that teachers will be better teachers if they can see themselves teach through the unfiltered lens of a video camera. Think about it. Just about every other performance-oriented occupation uses video to improve effectiveness.  For example, a benchmark behavior of professional athletes is their ability to consistently and critically evaluate their performance as recorded on a video.

Here is how I suggest a teacher get started.

  1. Be sure to communicate with the parents and the students that you are recording your class and the reasons you are doing it.
  2. Place the camera in a location where both you and the students are in the picture. (Sometimes the most important learning for a teacher is what the students are doing or not doing.)
  3. Videotape a lesson.
  4. Watch the video tape alone and take notes of things you “see” that are new.
  5. Watch the video with someone you respect as a teacher and listen to what they say they see and compare it with what you saw.
  6. Develop a plan to adapt your teaching to what you saw.
  7. Implement the plan and video tape a new lesson.
  8. Watch the video to see if you have made an effective change.

From my personal experience, I can guarantee that if a teacher follows these steps, better teaching will result.  Since the most effective way to improve student learning is to provide good teaching, why not? It’s inexpensive.  It’s easy.  Pair the process with a comprehensive, research-based instructional strategy training program and you’ve got an even more effective way to improve teaching.  Try it.

Exception to the Rule

February 28th, 2010 by James Scoolis

How does technology get adopted in the classroom?  Typically, of course, it doesn’t.

What usually occurs is  some early adopters take on the newest ideas while the bulk of teachers continue to do what they mostly have always done.  It took many years for simple email even to become a common daily tool for educators.

Yet, I am here to tell you I’ve seen this pattern broken; document cameras are an exception to the rule.

In a focused two-year effort, we provided every upper grade classroom at my school with a document camera, ceiling-mounted LCD projector, and a networked computer.  With the document camera leading the charge, this techno-trinity instantly transformed teaching in just about every subject area.

Every teacher has  integrated these tools into daily teaching.  I have seen a cow’s heart dissected on screen, student writing edited interactively by large and small groups, interactive read aloud made easy with text posted for all to see, highlighting to model thinking out loud, note taking modeled in content areas, whole group brainstorming, predictive thinking with graphic organizers, and real-time completion of a cloze reading passage with students working in cooperative groups.

Basically, all of this came about with the addition of three new tools and a forty minute in-service for teachers on how to use their new cameras and projectors.

Why has this happened?  Primarily, I think it’s because the combination of the document camera and projector simply represents a big improvement on what has been a mainstay in our classrooms for five decades—the stalwart overhead projector.   In that sense, these tools represent what Tom Carroll has called “transitional” technology; they afford teachers a way to do the “same thing” in a different and better way.

Money came from three basic sources: our parent teacher association, the federal EETT grant and our own school budget.  The installation took place in waves.  Finally, like the U.S. Army who introduced them to us, we’ve retired our World War II projectors.  And there are cost savings as well.  We’ve seen a reduction in the sheer number of paper copies being made and, perhaps best of all, no more calling the photocopy repair person to extract yet another mangled transparency from the bowels of the copy machine!

Staying afloat—and on course!

July 16th, 2009 by Tim Landeck
Queen Mary 2

Queen Mary 2

Times are hard.  According to a recent report, 48 of the 50 states are grappling with $166 billion in budget deficits for the coming year.  California’s share of that is at least $26 billion.  Districts are cutting librarians, music programs, sports, counselors, assistant principals, nurses, buses, and increasingly, teachers.  In California alone, over 26,000 teachers received pink slips this past spring.  With all of these cuts, how can the cost of supporting the technology infrastructure be justified?

Times may be hard, but times have also changed.  Today’s school district is nothing like it was 10 years ago.  In our district, for example, all of our computers are connected to the network and use the network to function.  People are saving and retrieving files constantly; network servers are hosting the programs that we access for student software, financial records, attendance, assessment, payroll—you name it, technology handles it.

Today it is virtually impossible for an office worker to accomplish anything without the use of a functioning, network-connected computer.  If the network connection goes down, it’s time to take an early lunch.  Imagine a bank today without access to its network.  It is the same in a typical school district office: everything comes to a screeching halt when the network goes down.

How can we not fund the positions that keep this technology functioning?  Is it realistic to think we can just hope the technology keeps working long enough to ride out the tough times?  I don’t think so.  I liken technology support to an ocean liner.  Cut the engines and for awhile, the ship will keep pointing in the right direction and moving quite quickly.  All too soon, however, even the QM2 will find itself adrift and out of control.

Let’s insist that technology in the schools be a high priority as we struggle to keep the engines running and our educational enterprise on course.