Posts Tagged ‘reading’

What we don’t know will hurt us.

January 3rd, 2011 by Jack Jarvis

hhos    i wasn’t rofl

Next time you read a 6th grader’s written assignment, don’t be surprised if you see unfamiliar acronyms popping up and a lack of proper grammar and basic punctuation.  The student may simply be stuck in “texting mode.”  Examples: hhos (Ha Ha only serious, as in “funny with an element of truth”) and rofl (rolling on the floor laughing).

We recently observed this incursion of text messaging shorthand into Standard English when students in our advanced computer group switched to the web-based version of their Holt Social Studies textbooks.  In reviewing  online assignments completed by these  students, I was shocked to see what appeared to be bone-headed errors in their written responses to social studies questions: first words of sentences lacking capitalization, ends of sentences missing periods, proper nouns without capitals.  Yet, these kids were proficient or above on last year’s CST.  What was going on?

The answer? These students are avid texters. They live to text. They don’t talk on the phone; they text. They don’t email; they text.  And the practice is now permeating their school writing—brb, culatr, omg, lol.  Not a capital to be found.  Abbreviations abound.  It would be safe to bet that time they spend texting and reading text messages surpasses the time they read and write in school.

We may be unwittingly aggravating the situation.  For awhile now, I’ve noticed teachers inadvertently limiting their students’ reading time by doing most of it for them.  At my site, we recently argued about how much reading a 6th grade teacher should do for the students.  In order to settle the argument, we asked those same proficient students what they thought. Their response? Yes, they can read the text themselves. Yes, the teacher “does it a lot,” said one student,  “and it takes a lot of time. ” “They should let us do it,” her classmate added.

We discovered another interesting fact in working with this bright group. When the students created PowerPoint presentations to summarize what they’d read in their online textbook, the same errors did not exist.  I asked a group of four students to explain.  Their reply? “We may have to present this to other kids and they’ll think we’re dumb.” Aha! A ray of hope.

The staff and I  certainly learned some useful lessons:

  • These kids actually want to read more on their own.
  • They text more than they read or write in school.
  • They sometimes slip into texting habits, but they’ll use better English when they know their work may be seen by a wider audience.

But perhaps the most important lesson we learned was the value of talking to them about their own learning more frequently.   As educators, what we don’t know about our students will hurt us!

Is It Reading?

February 10th, 2009 by Skip Johnson

It gets dark outside on a rainy December evening as twelve-year old Edgar sits in his family’s living room and waits for Mom to come home from work.  Dad won’t return until well after midnight from his job as a baggage handler at the airport.

Usually, Edgar would pass such time playing video games or watching television—conveniently forgetting homework and assigned chores.  This evening, however, Jim Dale tunes Edgar into Dicken’s A Christmas Carol via an  iPod Nano. Dale, a professional actor, presents this classic tale in a dramatic and engaging manner that captures Edgar’s attention for over an hour.  His little brother, Raul, sits opposite in an easy chair listening to Frog and Toad wonderfully read by author Arnold Lobel.  Neither boy hears Mom enter the house.  Sensing her presence, they look up, wave with a smile, and continue listening and reading.

On return to school the next morning, Raul enters his classroom, accesses his personal account on Scholastic Reading Counts, and takes a comprehension quiz.  He scores 100%.  Two days later, after finishing A Christmas Carol, Edgar  misses just one question on his 20-question quiz.

Thirty-nine of the 241 students at El Crystal School are enrolled in the Audiobook Program—which we call eCAP. Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI) scores for most are rising.  Enthusiasm and motivation for reading amongst this small group has  changed profoundly since the introduction of the iPod and the audiobooks.  Edgar is the star as his SRI has gained more than 170 points!

However, is this really reading? Are the students encoding and decoding words? Are they missing some intellectual exercise that influences their thinking and reasoning skills?  Frankly, I do not know.  What I do know is that since we introduced this program in October 2008,  each student in the eCAP Program has doubled his or her reading goal for the year, and we are only halfway to June.

To Read or Not to Read, a 2007 report from the National Endowment for the Arts, details the decline of reading amongst all demographic groups with the steepest drop among young adults in the last 10 to 20 years. The sharp decline in reading is accompanied by negative social, cultural, and economic implications.   The report notes that “Children who start reading for pleasure at an early age are exposed to exponentially higher numbers of new words—and a greater opportunity to develop literacy skills—than children denied early reading experiences.”  Frequent reading is an essential ingredient for building a sophisticated vocabulary.

Hopefully, our eCAP participants are being exposed to new vocabulary words.  To ensure that our eCAP readers focus upon vocabulary we are developing a series of podcasts for each story dealing with its specific vocabulary. We have also purchased a number of commercial study guides for many of the audiobooks.

Is there support for audiobooks in articles and research? One significant and supportive article is Plato Revisited: Learning Through Listening in the Digitial World written by David Rose and Bridget Dalton.  Basically, they explore the scientific difference between hearing and listening and build a strong case for the use of audiobooks with more than just blind and dyslexic students. Jim Trelease, the author of Read Aloud Handbook, advocates using audiobooks.  In her article “As Good as Reading,” Pamela Varley adamantly defends and advocates the use of audiobooks by children.

Recently, the foundation that sponsored our initial eCAP program has offered to supply each student with an iPod and to buy more books!  Should we accept this offer? Will we be ruining the habits of good readers?

So far, I’ve told them we need some time to consider the implications.  Your thoughts, please?