Posts Tagged ‘digital age’

Educators’ interest and enthusiasm for digital learning grows!

June 13th, 2011 by Sandra Miller

What’s driving educators’ enthusiasm for digital learning?  The latest Project Tomorrow Speak Up Survey suggests three factors:

 

 

  1. Teachers and administrators are using technology to improve their own productivity.  They use mobile devices, online classes and digital content; and this causes them to think creatively about using these same tools in the classroom.
  2. Students (and many parents) are demanding a different kind of learning experience, almost forcing teachers and administrators to reevaluate their ideas of the value of technology within learning.
  3. The economy and financial pressures on school budgets create a need to investigate how technology can help meet instructional goals with less expense.

The Speak Up Surveys have shown that teachers and administrators realize that students want to be “Enabled, Engaged, and Empowered,” yet there has been hesitancy in using technology to facilitate student learning.  District administrators and principals know creating a change in the values and skills of teachers to use digital content is a challenge.  These latest findings point to factors that may facilitate, even push, change.

Since 2008 twice as many administrators and teachers have smart phones, and 44% of teachers and 45% of administrators use Facebook.  Almost all teachers (96%) and administrators (99%) are tapping into communication tools to connect with peers or parents, but only 36% of teachers use these tools to connect with students.  (And students highly value this type of communication.)  The following chart shows teachers’ use of technology to facilitate student learning still has a ways to go.

Homework and practice is used most often, with other areas giving mixed results.  This suggests for administrators the need for teacher professional development, as well as tools and digital content to facilitate learning in new ways.  The use of online professional development may be one area that will assist, and the emergence this year of more and more inexpensive digital devices (tablets) offers administrators a starting point.

Teachers want to be effective in their teaching and researchers indicate the most solid predictor of student success is teacher effectiveness.  Getting teachers to report an increase in their effectiveness is a result we all want to strive toward.  In 2010, nearly a majority of teachers K-12 report technology helps them be more productive.  Sixty-eight percent of new teachers (1-3 years experience) say technology has increased their effectiveness by making them more productive, and 45% of these newest teachers say technology enables them to create more interactive lessons.  These are all positive indicators as we move toward facilitating student learning using technology.   

This look inside today’s classroom is just one part of Speak Up’s report: The New 3 E’s of Education: Enabled, Engaged, Empowered—How Today’s Educators are Advancing a New vision for Teaching and Learning.  Other key trends: Mobile Learning, Online and Blended Learning, and Digital Content are presented with interesting statistics to help administrators move forward toward a “new vision for learning.”

See this and other Speak Up reports.

Digital Native Innovations

March 28th, 2011 by Beth Stewart

A new challenge is on the horizon.  The digital natives are growing up and crossing over to the teaching profession—and their way of handling issues is very different from ours.

This is a new complication for our industrial era schools, the ones some of us enjoy and are comfortable with just as is.  We find ourselves living on the edge, being pushed to engage students in new ways, possibly having to leave behind our old, tried and true methods.

What will become of us?  Can computers, social networking, and video games take the place of teachers?  Do cell phones, podcasts, or video games have educational purposes?   Is it possible that a blend of our institutional wisdom and the knowledge and enthusiasm of the new recruits might be the ultimate synergy?

We’re starting to find answers to some of those questions at Morrilton Junior High School in the South Conway County (Arkansas) School District where the digital natives among our new teachers  have made us rethink what is possible.  No longer is a rainy winter time for students to meet the physical activity requirements by walking around the gym.  We have Wii tournaments!  No longer does a letter in the mail suffice for communicating with parents and the community.  We stream video messages from the Web.  No connectivity at home?  No problem.  The same videos loop on monitors in the office at high traffic times.

There seems to be no question these new teachers cannot answer.   Indeed, the quiet, steady beat of the digital natives’ drums are a constant reminder that we must look for new ways to engage our students.  No longer is it “traditional tribal customs” but “digital native innovations.”

What’s next?

January 31st, 2011 by James Scoolis

Recently I went to an in-service where I was advised to make my office “impeccable,” by which they basically meant nearly empty.  I was even told to get rid of my computer!  While that is not going to happen, I did decide to clean out my office.

I started with the bookcase.  I had books in there going all the way back to my master’s degree program when I was still a regular classroom teacher.  Let me just say that was when the internet was still considered experimental and “Apple or Windows?” remained a hotly debated question in school districts.   One book I moved to the donation-recycle pile was ASCD’s 1998 Yearbook, Learning with Technology.

Flipping through the pages I reflected on how far we in education have come with our long-desired “technology integration.” For example, there were visionary discourses on school in the 21st century with statements like, “Encourage teachers and students to start using the internet to become familiar with technology,” “Provide internet access in each classroom, or at least in as many classrooms as possible,” and “Provide email accounts for teachers.”    I think we have that last one under control.

There were also articles that discussed how technology would be the centerpiece of a complete redesign of schools—well, not schools, but rather learning centers, without actual classrooms, where  teams of teachers would work as learning facilitators.  That hasn’t happened yet anywhere near where I work.

What did the visionaries of 1998 omit from their prognostications?  There wasn’t anything in the book about discouraging students from bringing or using handheld internet devices.  No mention was made of the fact we should not use a student’s name in the subject line of an e-mail, nor were we reminded that each and every e-mail is, in fact, a permanent document subject to subpoena.  You get the idea.

Despite the fact not all of  the yearbook’s predictions have come to pass, technology certainly has become integrated into seemingly every aspect of life at school, home and work.  We have Google to answer our questions, Facebook to find and be a friend, and Wikipedia as a reliable source of information.   Our music, video and other entertainment is nearly all digital and available immediately online. The nature and concept of software itself is being transformed.  Fears that computers would isolate us or expose us to all sorts of revisionist history have proven false.

Schools, students, teachers, administrators—we all have and use technology.  Wow!  Now what?  What’s next?

What we don’t know will hurt us.

January 3rd, 2011 by Jack Jarvis

hhos    i wasn’t rofl

Next time you read a 6th grader’s written assignment, don’t be surprised if you see unfamiliar acronyms popping up and a lack of proper grammar and basic punctuation.  The student may simply be stuck in “texting mode.”  Examples: hhos (Ha Ha only serious, as in “funny with an element of truth”) and rofl (rolling on the floor laughing).

We recently observed this incursion of text messaging shorthand into Standard English when students in our advanced computer group switched to the web-based version of their Holt Social Studies textbooks.  In reviewing  online assignments completed by these  students, I was shocked to see what appeared to be bone-headed errors in their written responses to social studies questions: first words of sentences lacking capitalization, ends of sentences missing periods, proper nouns without capitals.  Yet, these kids were proficient or above on last year’s CST.  What was going on?

The answer? These students are avid texters. They live to text. They don’t talk on the phone; they text. They don’t email; they text.  And the practice is now permeating their school writing—brb, culatr, omg, lol.  Not a capital to be found.  Abbreviations abound.  It would be safe to bet that time they spend texting and reading text messages surpasses the time they read and write in school.

We may be unwittingly aggravating the situation.  For awhile now, I’ve noticed teachers inadvertently limiting their students’ reading time by doing most of it for them.  At my site, we recently argued about how much reading a 6th grade teacher should do for the students.  In order to settle the argument, we asked those same proficient students what they thought. Their response? Yes, they can read the text themselves. Yes, the teacher “does it a lot,” said one student,  “and it takes a lot of time. ” “They should let us do it,” her classmate added.

We discovered another interesting fact in working with this bright group. When the students created PowerPoint presentations to summarize what they’d read in their online textbook, the same errors did not exist.  I asked a group of four students to explain.  Their reply? “We may have to present this to other kids and they’ll think we’re dumb.” Aha! A ray of hope.

The staff and I  certainly learned some useful lessons:

  • These kids actually want to read more on their own.
  • They text more than they read or write in school.
  • They sometimes slip into texting habits, but they’ll use better English when they know their work may be seen by a wider audience.

But perhaps the most important lesson we learned was the value of talking to them about their own learning more frequently.   As educators, what we don’t know about our students will hurt us!

Two Cautionary Tales

May 29th, 2010 by Monte Burroughs

Man and woman peeking throughTwo recent legal cases present as cautionary tales concerning technology, civil rights, and the school’s role in loco parentis.

Evans v. Bayer involves a former student of Pembroke Pines (FL) Charter High School.  Katherine Evans created a Facebook account to express her dislike for a certain teacher at the high school. “But instead of other students expressing their dislike of the teacher,” writes Hannah Sampson of the Miami Herald, “most defended the teacher and attacked Evans.” Ms. Evans subsequently took down the Facebook page. Principal Peter Bayer later learned about the Facebook page and removed Ms. Evans from advanced placement classes and suspended her for three days.

Ms. Evans sued Principal Bayer for violating her civil rights under the 1st and 14th amendments, stating she had created the Facebook page after school, away from campus, using her computer.  The court agreed.

In  Blake J Robbins v. Lower Merion School District student Blake Robbins and his parents sued the Pennsylvania school district for “secretly viewing [the student] at home via webcams on school-issued laptops.” The district had issued all students at both its high schools laptop computers, each equipped with a built-in video camera.

According to a CBS News story, Harriton High School administrators accused Robbins of selling drugs and taking pills and stated they had images to prove it.  The student said the pictures show him eating candies.

Robbins and his parents allege that district employees, without parental knowledge or consent, remotely activated the camera on the student’s school-issued laptop and captured still images of family members in embarrassing and compromising situations.  The court issued an order prohibiting the district from “remotely activating, or causing to be remotely activated,” webcams on laptop computers issued to its students.  The case continues and you can follow it at Justia.com.

As school administrators, we need to take a lesson from both these cases.  Whether we’re dealing with how students are using technology or how we are using it ourselves, we need to clearly understand the limits of in loco parentis.