Archive for the ‘Professional development’ Category

A Creative Partnership for Success

January 17th, 2011 by Skip Johnson

Last November, as we were revising our Tech Plan, we noticed that the amount of hardware and software available in our district had increased fourfold during the previous four years, yet there was not much change or innovation in the types of software being used in the classrooms.  We decided to make the creation of a timely and quality professional development program the number one goal of our new plan.

For help we turned to a unique program in a nearby community college district.  The Krause Center for Innovation (KCI), located at Foothill College campus in Los Altos Hills, California, has for more than a decade provided a first-class, technology-focused professional development program supporting the usage of all types of technology in K-12 schools.  I approached KCI Executive Director Gay Krause with the notion of replicating the KCI vision in our district.  The result is a partnership between our school district and KCI that may serve as a model for other districts.

El Crystal School, where I am principal, was chosen as the site of our new center for three reasons: it’s already a demonstration school for implementing technology, it had an empty classroom, and yours truly offered to serve as the new center’s director.  We’ve dubbed it the Danford Center for Innovation in recognition of the Danford Foundation, which has donated thousands of dollars to support technology at our school.

How it works

The partnership between KCI and the San Bruno Park School District is defined in a memorandum of understanding that specifies responsibilities for both institutions while offering a great deal of flexibility as well.  District responsibilities include providing the facility, IT support, all technology equipment, and the director.  KCI provides faculty, determines the fee structure, advertises course offerings, and gives enrollment preference to district employees.  Working in unison, we are responsible for creating a Certificate of Technology Competency, based upon ISTE standards for teachers, that participants can earn through participation in the new center’s classes.

Once the Certificate of Technology Competence is designed and implemented,  KCI instructors will teach the specific courses in the Danford Center.  Teachers who enroll will pay tuition, which allows them to receive immediate credit on the district salary schedule.  A great advantage of this arrangement is that, since KCI is part of the community college system, tuition is very affordable.

The Danford Center will not serve only our school.  Our district will use the Danford Center to offer workshops as needed—such as a recent one on ways to use Thinkfinity—to meet  educational goals.  In addition, courses at the center will be open to all teachers in our county.

This venture is bold.  However, we believe it is our  task to give our students the essential skills, knowledge, and learning experiences they need to thrive and succeed in the 21st Century.  Learn more about:

Presentations to Remember

December 20th, 2010 by Thom Dunks

Presentation applications, such as PowerPoint and Keynote, are invaluable tools in the workplace and most particularly in the world of teaching and learning.  True, they are often maligned as an impediment to getting the message across, but used well they can help you reach the mind and the heart of your audience and create a truly lasting impression.

Recently, I was impressed with a fellow named David Jakes and his ideas about applying some basic knowledge of brain biology when you are constructing a presentation.  “The optic nerve is constructed of about 1 million nerve fibers; the auditory nerve, about 30,000,” says David.  “There is a tremendous amount of bandwidth associated with the eye, suggesting that presentations should contain a visual component.”  Accordingly, he suggests we should create more visually based materials and move away from too much emphasis on text.

In his hour-long presentation, “Standing Room Only:  How to Create Unforgettable Presentations,” David provides ten strategies for improving visual presentations.  The strategies are constructed around brain-based learning and the principles of visual modalities.  Particularly germane to this discussion are his inclusion of Visual Literacy, Brain Research/Cognitive Load Theory, Locating Images, Understanding Intellectual Property, Design Considerations, and Developing Voice.

David works with high school students in Illinois and is passionate about students approaching the creation of digital presentations with understanding and integrity.

“You first want the kids to write, to write deeply.  Have them make a scholarly argument on paper. Then have them take that piece of writing and create a storyboard.  Plan a presentation. Use visuals. Use emotion.  They should be able to convince me that they are right or their ideas have merit.  You then have a deep backup document that allows you to know that they have a true understanding of the topic at hand.”

Among the important topics David covers is acquiring royalty free images for use in student presentations.  Here are just a few of the resources he recommends for you to check out:

Ignite—rapid fire presentations!

December 5th, 2010 by Phoebe Bailey

Bored by tedious PowerPoint presentations?    Recently, I learned about two alternatives worth your consideration.

I was working with a team to plan a technology conference for 100 technology teacher leaders in our state when our keynote speaker, Tony Vincent, introduced us to “Pecha Kucha.”  To me it sounded like a character from a video game, and my two technology geek friends were clueless as well.  In fact, Pecha Kucha is a presentation format that restricts each presenter to 20 slides, each shown for 20 seconds.  The slides are set to advance automatically to ensure the time limit is honored.  Ultimately, each presenter has just 6 minutes 40 seconds to explain  ideas.

Yet even with that short time frame, we realized we would not have enough time for everyone to create and show a Pecha Kucha.  Mr. Vincent had an immediate answer: Ignite.  In this even briefer format, participants are given five minutes to speak accompanied by 20 slides. Each slide is displayed for 15 seconds, and slides are advanced automatically.  We agreed to give it a try and have an Ignite showcase the final day of the conference.  After all, how hard could this be, right?

We built time into the conference for participants to work on their presentations—either alone or with a group.  On showcase day we drew names to see who would have the opportunity to take the stage and share.  We allowed time for 18 presentations.  Sounds long until you do the math and see it’s only 90 minutes of total presentation time!    We had a variety of topics that ranged from parent involvement to Wikispaces in education to the impact your skin color has on others’ perceptions of you.  Using wiffiti, participants gave feedback on each presentation, which kept everyone engaged during transitions between speakers.

The overall feeling of the group was that preparing to give this type of presentation is not as easy as it looks!  It takes a lot of thoughtful planning to get the timing down and to get your message across in your allotted time.  However, the benefits are great.  (If fact, if teachers adopted this style of information sharing it might capture some of that the much-discussed shrinking attention span of students who are not being engaged in their learning and are bored in class!)

Take a look at the presentations created by our group!

Hey kids, what do you think of your teacher?

August 31st, 2010 by Michael Simkins

Earlier this month, the California Legislature passed a bill (SB 1422) that “authorizes the student government of a high  school to establish a committee to develop a survey to solicit student opinions of different class aspects and  teacher effectiveness, and establishes requirements for the  administration and results of the survey.”

Now, like any bill, this one has its critics.  Are students mature enough and do they have sufficient experience and emotional detachment to make valid judgments of their teachers?  Will they use the evaluation process as a way to “extort” a higher grade from a teacher in exchange for not being slammed as an incompetent jerk?  Will the bill and its various requirements actually retard efforts by forward thinking teachers, districts and schools that have already developed and implemented surveys for students to provide feedback to their teachers?

Those questions have yet to be answered.  In the meantime, there is no reason we can’t start thinking about how technology might help us should we, in concert with our student government, want to move forward.

Yes, of course, some meetings would be in order.  After all, we all spend a good part of our day on the same physical campus.  Nonetheless, the faculty, administration and students are occupied much of the day in separate activities and separate spaces.  So the committee working on this task might find it very useful to record meeting notes and develop drafts of a questionnaire using an online tool such as Google Docs or Buzzword.  These let committee members add their 2 cents whenever its convenient for them.  And anything they write is immediately available to the group.  Plus, you don’t have to deal with the confusion of several versions being exchanged among committee members and trying to make sure someone has the actual, final, complete version.

Once the developers agree to the questions that will be asked and the response scales, these can be easily deployed via simple online tools such as a Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, Zoomerang, or Qualtrics.

Whether or not you think it’s a great idea that high school students evaluate the effectiveness of their teachers, if you live in California it’s now a fact with which you’ve got to deal.  Check out these technology tools; they can really facilitate the process!

Mentoring for Student-Centric Learning

July 31st, 2010 by Sandra Miller

Students are motivated differently and want to learn in new ways.  One way to help teachers adapt to diverse and changing students may be to encourage them to think of themselves as mentors.

In his book Disrupting Class, Clayton Christensen talks about student-centric learning, “customized” learning, and teachers mentoring students.  Technology for customizing learning is being used across the country, and on-line learning institutions are becoming specialists in this area.  Christensen’s ideas on mentoring make sense and could be shared with teachers.  In particular, his discussion of  “challenges” and excuses as to why education has or hasn’t changed are well expressed.  Principals could use Christensen’s ideas as a springboard for faculty discussion about just what can be done to make our schools more successful.

The 2010 National Education Technology Plan,  Transforming American Education: Learning Powered by Technology echoes what Christensen and others are saying about changes to the traditional classroom program.

“…put students at the center and empower them to take control of their own learning by providing flexibility on several dimensions.  A core set of standards-based concepts and competencies should form the basis of what all students should learn, but beyond that students and educators should have options for engaging in learning…”

Christensen’s book and the new federal plan are great resources for us as we work to take on new roles and better utilize technology that can make us all more effective educators.