Archive for the ‘Productivity’ Category

Hey kids, what do you think of your teacher?

August 31st, 2010 by Michael Simkins

Earlier this month, the California Legislature passed a bill (SB 1422) that “authorizes the student government of a high  school to establish a committee to develop a survey to solicit student opinions of different class aspects and  teacher effectiveness, and establishes requirements for the  administration and results of the survey.”

Now, like any bill, this one has its critics.  Are students mature enough and do they have sufficient experience and emotional detachment to make valid judgments of their teachers?  Will they use the evaluation process as a way to “extort” a higher grade from a teacher in exchange for not being slammed as an incompetent jerk?  Will the bill and its various requirements actually retard efforts by forward thinking teachers, districts and schools that have already developed and implemented surveys for students to provide feedback to their teachers?

Those questions have yet to be answered.  In the meantime, there is no reason we can’t start thinking about how technology might help us should we, in concert with our student government, want to move forward.

Yes, of course, some meetings would be in order.  After all, we all spend a good part of our day on the same physical campus.  Nonetheless, the faculty, administration and students are occupied much of the day in separate activities and separate spaces.  So the committee working on this task might find it very useful to record meeting notes and develop drafts of a questionnaire using an online tool such as Google Docs or Buzzword.  These let committee members add their 2 cents whenever its convenient for them.  And anything they write is immediately available to the group.  Plus, you don’t have to deal with the confusion of several versions being exchanged among committee members and trying to make sure someone has the actual, final, complete version.

Once the developers agree to the questions that will be asked and the response scales, these can be easily deployed via simple online tools such as a Google Forms, SurveyMonkey, Zoomerang, or Qualtrics.

Whether or not you think it’s a great idea that high school students evaluate the effectiveness of their teachers, if you live in California it’s now a fact with which you’ve got to deal.  Check out these technology tools; they can really facilitate the process!

Using Visualization Tools to Get the Bigger Picture

August 24th, 2010 by Devin Vodicka

As you dive into the flow of minutia that comes with the opening of a new school year, don’t forget to take a moment now and then to stick your head above water and remind yourself of the Bigger Picture.  There are some excellent new visualization tools that can help you do it.  Let me show you what I mean.

A Blueprint for Reform is a 45-page document that outlines many proposed changes in the federal role with respect to public education.  You can use visualization tools to get a sense of the report even if you don’t have time to wade through all those pages.  As an example, I’ve created several graphics using  Many Eyes, a beta project out of IBM that lets you upload data (for example the text of a document) and then analyze it in various ways.  Creating a “word cloud” is one example.

Some of the words that jump out are not surprising.  We would expect that the Blueprint would reference schools and students.  I was most struck by the way that the word “will” stands out in the word cloud.  Some of this may be due to the fact that the document describes a desired future, but there may be other implications as well.  Also of interest is the pervasiveness of “college” in this document for K-12 education.  This is reflective of the emerging emphasis on college and career readiness that we can expect to amplify in the near future.  For those interested in hints about future funding, the phrase that jumps out to me is “grants.”

Another visualization that I created pulled two-word pairs instead of singletons .  This visual suggests that the U.S. Department of Education will be shifting away from formula-funded resources to more competitive grants.  We can also see that the emphasis on student groups such as English Learners is not likely to diminish.  Other phrases that stand out include career-ready, effective teachers, and charter schools.  I’m pleased to see student growth emerge as a concept that may help reframe our accountability systems.

My next visualization of the Blueprint was to create a “phrase cloud” that indicates relationships between words in the Blueprint.  This diagram helps to reveal the thinking behind the organization of the Blueprint.  For example, states will work with districts, districts will work with schools, schools include support systems that will improve, develop, strengthen, and expand practices and programs.  It is also interesting to see nonprofits included as partners to districts.  Notice also how each mention of teacher (or teachers) is connected to principals and leaders.

Given my interest in data and technology, I next created word trees that isolated those terms to provide a quick visual synopsis of the role of those items in the Blueprint.  For technology, this graphic reveals how it is embedded within the Blueprint as a tool to improve instruction and address student learning challenges.  This word tree also shows a connection in the document between technology and engineering and mathematics—this is reflective of the expansion of this reauthorization away from just English Language Arts and Mathematics.

The word tree for data reflects an emphasis on systems, identification of local needs, and also includes a number of data elements that we can expect to see included in the new accountability model.  Many of those data elements, including disaggregated analyses, are familiar to us but some—such as levels of support and working conditions—will require entirely new data collection systems and methods.

You can explore the online graphics or you can use the data set to create your own visualizations.  I am hopeful that this visual tour of the Blueprint has been a helpful introduction to what appears to be an ambitious agenda for educational reform.  It is my belief that we as educational leaders must not only leverage existing technology tools such as these online visualization resources, but also network and connect with one another to share information and knowledge as we continue to navigate this transition into a new era of public education.

What’s New on Google Docs?

May 28th, 2010 by Susan Brooks-Young

Google Docs screenshotLaunched in 2006, Google Docs is built on three web-based applications: word processing; spreadsheets; and, a presentation tool. These free, easy-to-use tools make it possible for users to not only access files from any Internet-connected computer, but also to invite others to view and edit files, supporting real time collaboration at a level not previously possible.

Why blog about a tool that’s nearly four years old? Recently, Google launched several new features making it even easier for users to work collaboratively to create and edit word processing documents, spreadsheet files, and now drawings as well. Here’s a quick rundown on some of the most useful new features.

Word processing: Updated editing capabilities are the main feature here. It’s now possible to see character-by-character editing being done by collaborators without having to refresh the page. This means collaborators can make changes without having to worry about over-writing one another. A chat feature has been added as well so collaborators can ‘talk’ with one another as they work. It is also now possible to format documents using tabs and real margins. As a result, it will be easier to retain formatting when uploading and downloading documents.

Spreadsheets: Speed is a key descriptor for improvements made here. Spreadsheets load faster and are easier to navigate (both scrolling and from sheet to sheet). It’s now possible to edit cells in the formula bar and to drag and drop columns.

Draw: The drawing tool, launched a year ago, made it possible to embed drawings in other files. Now it’s possible to create and collaborate on stand-alone drawings thanks to a new drawing editor that allows users to work collaboratively on individual draw files.

Google Docs has become an indispensable tool for many educators. The price is right, the learning curve is minimal, software compatibility issues are eliminated, and it facilitates true collaboration for educators and students. If you haven’t given Google Docs a try, now is the time. If you are a current user, you’ll definitely appreciate these most recent improvements.

For a quick recap of the information provided here, or to share with colleagues, check out this YouTube video, Introducing a New Google Docs.

My Magic Pen

January 20th, 2010 by Phoebe Bailey

I remember the first time I heard Bill Daggett speak.  It was probably ten years ago when I was beginning my job at an education service center in Arkansas.  One of the upcoming innovations he discussed was a “magic pen.”  He described this as a computer in a pen.  My first thought was that if such a pen were already invented, I’d buy one!  I was about to return to school for an administration certification and thought how much easier such a pen would make my life.

Fast forward seven years.  The magic pen was a reality and I had my first experience with one.  It was not favorable.  I was on an audit team that was piloting the use of a digital pen to upload observation data.  The pen doubled our work!  First, we took classroom observation and interview notes on regular paper; then, we had to rewrite everything on special paper provided with the digital pen.  The problem was aggravated by kinks in the software.

Given that negative experience, I was in no hurry to try out later versions of the magic pen.  My attitude changed, however, at the NECC 09 conference.  I was trying to recall something the keynote speaker had said when a friend of mine whipped out his digital pen, touched it to paper, and out came the speaker’s voice!  This magic pen had not only captured the text but also the audio of the presentation.

Now that is a computer in a pen.  I bought one and love it.  It helps me never miss a word and records everything I hear, say and write, as well as providing links between my audio recordings and my notes.  It has become a life saver in our board meetings.  It is very helpful for clarifing motions and makes taking minutes simple.  Our content specialists use it in demonstration lessons with teachers to model student interviews.

And new functions keep coming.  Recently launched apps help you with such tasks as translating phrases into other languages, checking facts on all sorts of subjects, listening to classical music, and even playing a guitar.  I look forward to continuing to learn more uses for my “magic pen!”  (Oh, in case you were wondering, mine is a “Pulse” pen by Livescribe; view it and other brands here.)

To Share or Not to Share
Using Social Networking for Work

November 16th, 2009 by Kay Tepera
Image by Scott Maxwell

Image by Scott Maxwell.

Do you remember your first day in the classroom?  I remembered mine as I read a recent article about a new teacher, just out of college, who was struggling with the huge task of understanding her new job.  Her experience sounded so familiar.  Walk into the school.  Get handed a key to the classroom.  Find your mailbox.  Get a stack of textbooks.   Yikes! What next?

That was the dilemma of the teacher in the article: what next? After feeling totally overwhelmed, this teacher turned to the Internet and used a social networking tool to seek help.  She posted the simple question, “I’m new, what do I do now?”  In a matter of hours she received sixty responses to this plea for help.  She even had experts come to her aid.

Talk about curriculum building!  Teachers today seem more willing to assist and collaborate with their peers than ever before.  Social networking sites seem to offer a non-threatening forum where teachers can share and exchange their ideas.

As I remember that exciting yet scary feeling as I walked into my classroom for the first time, I wonder why, if social networking tools are so easily accessible to us, we aren’t sharing more? Why do so many teachers still struggle alone with more and more paperwork? More and more papers to grade? More and more expectations?  Couldn’t social networking sites provide the avenue for educators to share how they have solved problems? Organized the mountain of assignments to grade?  Managed high expectations?  Dealt with thorny questions on curriculum?

So I now ask you:  “To share or not to share?”  What’s your experience with social networking to assist you with your work?