Archive for the ‘Pondering’ Category

What Technology Do Students Want?

May 2nd, 2011 by Sandra Miller

Boy with smart phoneResults from the latest Project Tomorrow Speak Up Survey suggest today’s  students are looking at a different paradigm in their learning experiences.

Students today are inseparable from their mobile technologies; instant messaging and texting is a way of life.  And they want to use their technology at school.

It’s tempting to dismiss that idea out of hand, but actually,  I’m impressed with the answers kids give when asked, “How would you use your mobile technologies for help with your school work?”  Older students—those in 9th–12th grades— would use them in ways we would describe as traditional.

  • 74% would check grades.
  • 59% would take notes in class.
  • 50% would use the calendar.
  • 44% would access online textbooks.

Younger students—those in 6th–8th grades—want to leverage emerging technologies in different ways to help with their schoolwork.

  • 68% would do Internet research, anytime, anywhere.
  • 53% would collaborate with peers and teachers.
  • 37% would create and share documents.
  • 35% would record lectures/labs to review again later.

While their teachers may cite lack of preparation, antiquated equipment or slow networks as impeding the use of technology in the classroom, 53%t of middle and high school students say the largest obstacle they face in using technology in their school today is their inability to use their own devices!

While many teachers and administrators have begun to approach new ways of using technology in classrooms, this latest Speak Up research says there is more than a gap between what many schools offer and students want—there’s a chasm!  When administrators were asked, “How likely are you to let students use their cell phones?” only 22% said likely; 63% said NOT likely.

By contrast, 67% of parents said they would buy a cell phone for their student to use at school, and 54% would also buy a data plan to support their student’s work.  And we’re not talking only affluent parents.  The Speak Up Survey results did not find significant differences among parents responses for any of the demographics that were tracked.

In fact, parents’ pressure on schools may just be the next trend in moving technology forward in our schools.  Today’s parents use technology daily in their work as well as in their social lives.  The Speak Up survey showed 57% of parents today consider instructional technology to be “extremely important” for their child’s success.  Only 37% of teachers see technology as that important.  Indeed, for leaders wanting to integrate technology in their schools, this is a challenge!

Students definitely have a clear vision of the potential of mobile learning to enable, engage, and empower them as 21st century learners.  Their parents see technology’s value.  As educational leaders we must spread this vision to our teachers and help them acquire the skills and technology needed to teach in more meaningful ways that match the tech-intensive lives of today’s students.

Fitbit

April 18th, 2011 by Devin Vodicka

Do you have a fitbit?  I do.  It’s  a tiny device that can be worn on a belt clip or armband and tracks movement at all times.  When I get within range of my wireless sync station, my activity becomes available via an interactive website with a number of analytic tools.  These activity reports track calories burned, number of steps taken, net mileage, and a “performance level” of my movement for the day.  Here is one of my recent reports on a day where I was reasonably active.

Notice how the data is recorded in 5-minute increments.

The fitbit also creates a record of your sleep, including the number of times you awaken during the night.

Individual data can then be compared with peers to determine relative performance:

 

Finally, there is also a food log with numerous reporting options as well:

This abundance of data is typical of the potential that we have now in the digital age.  One tiny, relatively cheap device is generating detailed, drill-down performance metrics that can be displayed in a number of different ways to help me understand my own activity and performance.

Imagine the potential if every student had their own fitbit, tracking their performance in real-time with immediate feedback that can be used to help the students to understand themselves, set goals, and make adjustments in their own behaviors.  Now imagine that it wasn’t just tracking physical activity, but also the ability to apply learning in a meaningful way.  How would schools change?  How would teaching change?  How would kids change and how would society begin to change?

The Teacher Makes the Difference

April 11th, 2011 by Stephen Vaughn

Teacher with studentsMaybe we have given technology too much credit.  Don’t get me wrong.  I love technology as much as the next guy, but I think the overall impact of technology on learning is controlled by one factor that has nothing to do with technology.  The teacher makes the difference.

I realize I may be stating the obvious here, but I think the education world has lost sight of this.  For years, I have seen programs and technologies promoted as “teacher-proof” when the truth was the good teacher was “program-proof.”  No matter the adopted materials or technology, the good teacher teaches well.

I believe there are two characteristics that are the foundation of being a good teacher.  The first  is being smart. I read that the majority of teachers in the United States come from the bottom 20% intellectually of those who attend college. I don’t know if that is true, but I do know there are many teachers who care deeply about children, who have a true desire to teach and see students learn, who are dedicated and hard working, yet who are mediocre teachers at best because they just don’t have the mental capacity to handle the complexity of the task.  A coach I know once said about basketball players, “You can’t teach seven foot; a player either has it or doesn’t.”

Good teachers make quick, correct decisions on the fly. They break complex concepts down into learnable parts, and they synthesize ideas together to make themes. They see interactions and connections where others with less intelligence don’t see anything.  Maybe school districts should get serious about making the teaching profession more appealing to the smart people of the world so more of them will decide to be teachers.

The second characteristic that makes up the foundation of a quality teacher is character. I have heard it said that there can be “no correction without relationship.”   I would expand that today, “There can be no teaching without relationship.”

Again, I may be stating the obvious, but someone isn’t getting this. I know many teachers who frankly have limited or questionable character.  What I mean by character is a person of integrity, a person who is honest, a person who puts others’ needs first, a person who is stable, a person who respects others.  You can probably think of a great teacher right now who matches that description. You knew they cared about you and you were willing to do what they said, even when it was hard or not what you wanted to do.

I believe we have diluted our expectation of character in teachers today.  Our system tolerates wrong behavior.  Let me give you an example.  A few years back, I had an attorney tell me that he wasn’t sure a school district would prevail in a dismissal case in which the teacher was charged with buying drugs for middle school students and having engaged in sex with them.  The attorney was uncertain these would be sufficient grounds for dismissal!

I have frequently seen the “rights” of teachers override the “rights” of students.  That is a big problem, but it is not the worst part of this lack of character. The worst part is the erosion of trust, especially the students’ trust. People don’t learn from people they don’t trust.  I think Margaret Wheatley was right: relationship is the only thing that matters, especially when it comes to learning.

So our challenge is not simply to find and purchase the best technology for our schools.  We have to make sure we put it in the hands of teachers who are smart, of strong character, and who can build positive, trusting relationships with their students.

Digital Native Innovations

March 28th, 2011 by Beth Stewart

A new challenge is on the horizon.  The digital natives are growing up and crossing over to the teaching profession—and their way of handling issues is very different from ours.

This is a new complication for our industrial era schools, the ones some of us enjoy and are comfortable with just as is.  We find ourselves living on the edge, being pushed to engage students in new ways, possibly having to leave behind our old, tried and true methods.

What will become of us?  Can computers, social networking, and video games take the place of teachers?  Do cell phones, podcasts, or video games have educational purposes?   Is it possible that a blend of our institutional wisdom and the knowledge and enthusiasm of the new recruits might be the ultimate synergy?

We’re starting to find answers to some of those questions at Morrilton Junior High School in the South Conway County (Arkansas) School District where the digital natives among our new teachers  have made us rethink what is possible.  No longer is a rainy winter time for students to meet the physical activity requirements by walking around the gym.  We have Wii tournaments!  No longer does a letter in the mail suffice for communicating with parents and the community.  We stream video messages from the Web.  No connectivity at home?  No problem.  The same videos loop on monitors in the office at high traffic times.

There seems to be no question these new teachers cannot answer.   Indeed, the quiet, steady beat of the digital natives’ drums are a constant reminder that we must look for new ways to engage our students.  No longer is it “traditional tribal customs” but “digital native innovations.”

What’s next?

January 31st, 2011 by James Scoolis

Recently I went to an in-service where I was advised to make my office “impeccable,” by which they basically meant nearly empty.  I was even told to get rid of my computer!  While that is not going to happen, I did decide to clean out my office.

I started with the bookcase.  I had books in there going all the way back to my master’s degree program when I was still a regular classroom teacher.  Let me just say that was when the internet was still considered experimental and “Apple or Windows?” remained a hotly debated question in school districts.   One book I moved to the donation-recycle pile was ASCD’s 1998 Yearbook, Learning with Technology.

Flipping through the pages I reflected on how far we in education have come with our long-desired “technology integration.” For example, there were visionary discourses on school in the 21st century with statements like, “Encourage teachers and students to start using the internet to become familiar with technology,” “Provide internet access in each classroom, or at least in as many classrooms as possible,” and “Provide email accounts for teachers.”    I think we have that last one under control.

There were also articles that discussed how technology would be the centerpiece of a complete redesign of schools—well, not schools, but rather learning centers, without actual classrooms, where  teams of teachers would work as learning facilitators.  That hasn’t happened yet anywhere near where I work.

What did the visionaries of 1998 omit from their prognostications?  There wasn’t anything in the book about discouraging students from bringing or using handheld internet devices.  No mention was made of the fact we should not use a student’s name in the subject line of an e-mail, nor were we reminded that each and every e-mail is, in fact, a permanent document subject to subpoena.  You get the idea.

Despite the fact not all of  the yearbook’s predictions have come to pass, technology certainly has become integrated into seemingly every aspect of life at school, home and work.  We have Google to answer our questions, Facebook to find and be a friend, and Wikipedia as a reliable source of information.   Our music, video and other entertainment is nearly all digital and available immediately online. The nature and concept of software itself is being transformed.  Fears that computers would isolate us or expose us to all sorts of revisionist history have proven false.

Schools, students, teachers, administrators—we all have and use technology.  Wow!  Now what?  What’s next?