Archive for the ‘Leadership’ Category

Don’t Just Say No

October 26th, 2009 by Bob Blackney

Should we allow students to bring electronic files to school?  Every district faces this question.  What’s more, it’s an issue that does not warrant a simple yes or no answer because it pits two foundational goals against one another.

On one hand, we are educational institutions.  Our base purpose is to foster our students’ learning.  There is certainly educational benefit to students being able to move their files from home to school and back again.    Preventing access to external files makes learning more difficult for students and teaching more difficult for staff.

On the other hand, we have a mandate to provide a safe and secure environment for learning.  Free file exchange between home and school comes with serious risks.  Some students may bring inappropriate videos or photos.  Disgruntled students or pranksters may introduce viruses  or other malicious software.  Even the most responsible students may, by opening an innocent looking email attachment, spread malware that brings down networks and takes an already overworked technical staff weeks to locate and eradicate.

Districts have sought a secure, effortless and cost effective method to allow students to safely transfer appropriate files to and from school.  Unfortunately, most approaches are less than ideal.  Yet, without a secure technological solution, how do you balance the need for educational support and technological security?

In Placentia-Yorba Linda Unified School District, we rely on the professional judgment of our site technology leaders.  They work with staff to analyze each situation thoughtfully and make daily decisions on student safety.  To maintain a balanced policy, site leaders work with teachers and other staff to consider factors such as:

  • Is there a compelling educational need to transfer files?
  • Are the students likely to use the resources well?
  • Can accessing district servers from home provide the needed resource?
  • Does the staff member making the request have the technical skills to assure it is used safely?
  • Is the educational pay off on the proposed activity worth the risk?

Weighing the nuances of the potential rewards and mitigating the district’s exposure to risk requires information, assistance and judgment.  Such deliberation is not unique to technology; the same process applies when considering the value of other proposals such as field trips, school assembly programs, or even tuning in to the President’s speech to students!

It is incumbent on technology leaders to help all staff members understand complicated technological issues as well as to be open to the needs of staff members.   We have relied on site staff for a number of years and have not had any serious issues to this point.  We trust, communicate, and partner with all staff to keep our network safe and our students learning.

Change—it’s more than a wordle

July 23rd, 2009 by Michael Simkins

Building 21st century schools takes leaders who know how to initiate and sustain change.   No easy task!

Initiating and sustaining change is the final topic we address in the School Leader Development workshop.  After reviewing some key resources on change management, the participants work in small groups to identify what they believe are the Big Ideas when it comes to leading a change process.   They write each Big Idea on a slip of paper.  I collect the slips, and then the fun begins.  It’s time for charades!

Eyes roll.  Grumbling erupts.  Passionate protestations ensue.  But I am unrelenting.   We will do this.  We review the basic rules of charades, including the common gestures used in the game.  Then each person, in turn, pulls a slip from the box and acts out a Big Leadership Idea until the rest of us figure it out.

There are two reasons I use this particular activity.  First, it tends to put the participants out of their comfort zones, which is exactly what they’ll be asking of their staffs.  And second, we have a lot of fun; see for yourself!

Below is the list of Big Ideas generated by the superintendents, principals, and other school leaders who attended our most recent workshop.  Click here to see a wordle created from this list.

Monitor, Assess And Adjust
Create Strategic Plan
Cast A Vision
Communication, Voice
Commitment To Change
Sustain Change
Share Vision
Collaboration, Deep Discussion, Task Cycle
Sustain Change, Inquiry Cycle, Internalize
Shared Vision
Relationships
Commitment
Model Process, Acquire Skills Yourself
Discussion And Input
Broad-Based Buy-In
Develop Expert Teams
Group Buy-In
Identify Needs
Teacher Buy-In

Hope for the Future of Schools

June 15th, 2009 by Sandra Miller

Look to the Future by darkmatter; used with permission.

There is lots of talk about how our schools must change to prepare students for the 21st Century.  In fact, given the new technologies being developed everyday and the way in which young people embrace technology in their daily lives, it is obvious that our schools will change. So as leaders in our schools, where does that leave us? There is so much to change that it seems overwhelming.  Where do we start?

Many of today’s veteran educators used project-based learning and a constructivist approach in the early 90’s if not before. Students were taught to construct their own meaning using cooperative learning and projects. Current brain research confirms the effectiveness of such approaches.  Yet, in this decade, assessment became the guiding mantra, and students and teachers now focus their efforts toward higher test scores. Project-based learning and constructivism faded into the background as direct instruction and teaching to the test took center stage.

Today there is hope as project-based learning again gains momentum. One thing we can do is encourage this type of learning in the classrooms and beyond the school walls. The Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow 2 project has rechristened it challenge-based learning.  Whatever the name, the goals are the same.  Apples’ white paper, “Apple Classrooms of Tomorrow—Today,” is good reading for anyone who wants to share the future with others.  The following quotation is from that paper.

These are profound changes that require schools to become more than information repositories; they must also be places where students can acquire knowledge and skills they can use to solve complex problems for the rest of their lives. These changes affect the role of educators even more dramatically. Educators must become more than information experts; they must also be collaborators in learning-leveraging the power of students, seeking new knowledge alongside students, and modeling positive habits of mind and new ways of thinking and learning.

As we grapple with our current economic woes, new technology purchases will likely be minimal.  Yet there is important work we can do that will cost us nothing.  We can  share the goals for 21st century learning.  We can share them with parents, other administrators, teachers, support staff, and students.  The Partnership for 21st Century Skills Framework is widely accepted and provides guidance in every possible area.

The road ahead for schools will be a challenge, but there is always hope.  Many new teachers will already know the technologies, but they need wisdom and guidance from us as leaders.  We will need to help young teachers learn how to share their knowledge with students in ways that will embrace 21st Century Skills.  We will also need to give them the freedom to help seasoned teachers reach new levels of teaching.

It is a small start, but it is a hopeful one. You aren’t alone and others have already laid out some guidelines. Share the information and point others to resources.  Then watch as the new generation takes over in our schools, and know you helped lead the way.

The $64,000 Question

May 9th, 2009 by Butch Owens

Again and again we hear that we must get students ready for the 21st Century.  Yet,  here we are nine years into the 21st Century and we’re educating students the same way we’ve been doing it for years.   We’re doing a pretty good job; in fact, we could probably continue the status quo for the remainder of our careers with fair results on measures such as test scores, college entrance rates, and graduation rates.   The downside of continuing with our present way of doing school is, of course, that our children—and they are our children—will be totally unprepared to compete in a globally connected society.

What do I mean when I say “our present way of doing school?”  I’m talking about our current preoccupation with constantly testing students’ accumulation of knowledge, without ever stopping to consider if the knowledge we’re forcing them to accumulate will be of any use to them.  Consider this:

If it’s easy to test, it’s easy to digitize.

Hank Rubin, president of the Institute for Collaborative Leadership, heard that remark made at the release of the 2007 PISA study.  It piqued his interest enough that he contacted the person who said it: Andreas Schleicher, the study’s lead author.  Says Rubin:

…in subsequent correspondence with Schleicher, I confirmed the deeper meaning of his observation: if you can ask a person a question for which we know there is a limited number of appropriate responses, then we can teach a computer to run through those same responses and select what evidence tells us is the most correct response. In other words, if you can test it then you can delegate the task, knowledge or skill to a computer! The implications are profound: why in the world will we need to invest education dollars in preparing students with knowledge and skills that will be the domain of computers by the time they are ready to enter the world of work?

The $64,000 question is, “What will students need to know to be successful in the future?” For starters, we must ask, “Is this something that a student can access in a nano second with a web search which yields thousands of references?”

I can’t count the number of times a day I do a quick search on the web to find the answer to a question.   It would seem very archaic to only have one textbook sitting here at my desk to look up needed information.  Yet students in our schools face this challenge daily due to limited access and our tight filtering policies.  It’s not until they leave school that they have unlimited access  to the rest of the world.  Until we find an answer to access, we will continue school as usual.

But wait!  The answer to the $64,000 question has changed since I started writing this post a couple of days ago.  I was operating on the assumption that when we want to know something, we make a quick search for the answers we need.  Not necessarily, it seems; the answers may find us on their own!  Puzzled?   Take a look at this TED Talks video and you’ll see what I mean.

President Obama Appoints Nation’s First Chief Technology Officer

April 25th, 2009 by Susan Brooks-Young

Last October, Barak Obama promised that if he were elected, he would create a new cabinet-level position. Saying that the United States has not done nearly enough to tap into technology and its potential for creating new jobs, Obama proposed creating the position of Chief Technology Officer (CTO).  Now, six months later, this promise has come to fruition. During his weekly address on April 18, President Obama announced that Aneesh Chopra will be the nation’s first CTO.

Currently serving as Secretary of Technology for the state of Virginia, Chopra’s new position comes with three goals that support the new administration’s top priorities. First, he is charged with promoting use of technology to support job creation. Second, Chopra is to explore ways technology use can be leveraged to reduce health care costs. Finally, he is to focus on use of technology to increase national security.

The business world sees this as a welcome step toward updating and expanding a national infrastructure that recently has received little attention. This sector also views this appointment as a commitment to returning the U.S. to a leadership role in technology-related advances worldwide. But what do educators think about this new position and the impact Mr. Chopra might have on bringing schools into the Digital Age?

Whether it happens in K-12 grades, post-secondary programs, or on-the-job training courses, every one of the three goals listed above must include an education component in order to be successfully implemented. How will education leaders take advantage of this fact to leverage resources and launch innovative programs designed to help the new CTO meet his goals? What related conversations are taking place in your school, district, or region? Share your ideas here.

Reblog this post [with Zemanta]