Predictions for 2012

January 31st, 2012 by Butch Owens

Yogi Berra once said, “It’s tough to make predictions, especially about the future.”

That’s especially true in the world of technology today, but I think we can, at least, predict what the hot topics will be as we head into 2012.  Most important is how we respond to these issues.  Let’s take a look at some of my top picks which should be on every administrator’s radar.

BYOD – Bring your own device:  We have been talking about  1:1 computing for a number of years with very little progress other than a few pilot projects.  With the current budget situation I don’t foresee any changes in funding coming forward to make this a reality.  If we truly embrace getting devices into student’s hands we must look past the restraints of budget.  By embracing a “Bring Your Own Device” (BYOD) model we will succeed in getting devices into a lot more student hands in the classroom this year rather than have the devices sitting at home because of current school policy that forbids their use on campus.  I spoke of this earlier this year in a TBLOGICAL post called Digital Deprivation.  All students having access to digital devices capable of enhancing their educational experience is becoming even more realistic when you consider cheaper and cheaper devices such as the Kindle Fire, inexpensive netbooks, tablets, and Smart Phones on the market today.

Key topics to address:  BYOD Policies, Wireless Access, Bandwidth, Devices supported

24/7 Access to Information: Just a couple of years ago sites like Khan Academy were seen as a novelty.  A few tech savvy teachers might download a video to help explain a topic or give students a link to follow if they needed extra help with a concept.  Today it is no longer a novelty to see a short video clip on a subject.  Just go to YouTube and type in a topic you would like to know from replacing a valve cover gasket on your car to DNA replication.   These sites and videos are growing at a phenomenal rate, both proprietary and open source.

Key Topics to Address:  Teaching students to discriminate the good from the bad,  Providing Open Access at School,

24/7 Delivery of Course Content:  Yes, this does relate to 24/7 access, but takes it a step further.  Not only can students find information anytime and from any place, they can also elect to take all of their courses this way.  What that says to me is that if we don’t have it, they will go somewhere else to get it.

I recently had an opportunity to hear Dr. David Hagland, Director of Educational Options with the Riverside Unified School District, speak.  He has found that students don’t necessarily want to take a course completely online, but rather like to expand the classroom and teacher’s influence to an online blended format that includes lectures, class notes, videos, et cetera posted for student access before and after the traditional classroom lesson, and to have 21st Century technology tools available in the classroom.  For example, as I sit here typing this post in Google Docs, I know that I can access it on my computer at home, my iPad on the road or even share it with colleagues to get input and advice.  I’ve also clipped a few articles from the web into my Evernote account to reference as I write.  All of these tools and resources need to be incorporated into the teaching and learning environments of our students.

Key topics to address:  Learning platforms/management systems, online storage capabilities, teacher training for blended instruction, access to information.

School Libraries:  I know this prediction will not be a popular one, but the changing purpose and function of the school library needs to be addressed.  Schools are no longer getting the best bang for their buck when it comes to building and sustaining the traditional school library.  In a recent conversation with Dr. Devin Vodicka, Assistant Superintendent of Business for the Carlsbad Unified School District, we were discussing the new high school they were in the process of building. He stated that after much discussion on whether or not to build a traditional library it came down to the following question, “If we are really having such a difficult time deciding whether or not to build and stock a new library with books in the traditional way, we already know the answer, which is no. It’s just that it’s uncomfortable for our generation to picture a library without rows and rows of books.”

Are we still making decisions on what is comfortable for us or best for today and tomorrow’s students.  I’m not saying we need to do away with the library, just look at its role and function in our schools.  It will always be needed as a place to meet for that first date using the excuse as getting together to work on a school project.

Key Topics to address:  Digital books/textbooks and a system to checkout them out, installation of access points for students to connect at school, mobile devices,  workstations

 

eTextbooks: Blunder or Bonanza?

January 18th, 2012 by George Lieux

Providing students with eTextbooks could positively impact teaching and learning in ways we may have never thought possible.  However, broad-scale initiatives to do so could backfire and setback the use of technology in our schools for years to come.

The eTextbook blunder could occur if digital copies of traditional textbooks are purchased along with traditional ancillaries that are part of the textbook package.  With the same textbook in digital format and the same worksheets with the same approach to teaching, no improvements in learning are likely.  The cost for providing textbooks would increase because students would need some kind of a device to access the digital textbook content.  In this scenario, maintaining the status quo simply comes with a higher price tag. It would not take school board members long to notice that more money is being spent and nothing has improved.

On the other hand, if the personal learning device purchased to access eTextbooks also provides Internet access, students and their teachers could access a variety of free online learning tools.  With Internet access, a teacher could learn from an innovative educator like Naomi Harm, who has several excellent online publications that provide easy access to hundreds of tools and proven ideas. One of Naomi’s online publications that stands out for me is her Web 2.0 NETS Aligned Tools 2010. Here a teacher can easily connect content standards to ISTE’s technology standards with appropriate tools for achieving both content and technology standards.

Textbooks created by teachers

For those who are embracing standards-based approaches to learning, content standards could be the outline for a course’s content. The textbook could then be a digital document created by teachers.  A Moodle, or other learning management system, could become the “home” of the teacher-created textbooks.

While content standards provide an outline for a course’s content, the real lessons, activities, projects and assessments remain for the teacher to develop in lieu of a textbook.

Another educator who provides the best tech resources is Tony Vincent.  His Learning in Hand website consistently provides educators with the latest and greatest in the mobile education world. His detailed explanations about completing a specific project provides an excellent how-to book for any teacher focused on project-based learning.

Numerous online resources like Thinkfinity , teAchnology, TeachersFirst.com and Curriki provide thousands of  free  lesson plans, student interactives, games and tools.

Technology and the Internet have made it possible for teachers to create online textbooks that challenge students and provide learning possibilities that develop 21st Century Skills. Textbook money could be used to purchase personal learning devices for students to access their eTextbooks.  Everything is in place for dedicated teachers who are willing to embrace the challenge of creating textbooks collaboratively to positively impact teaching.  Students could come to love learning during their entire thirteen years in our classrooms!

Five “Smart” Tech Skills

December 28th, 2011 by Jack Jarvis

During the last decade, schools received unprecedented funding through both federal and state initiatives.  For example, in California, we had Immediate Intervention for Underperforming Schools and the High Priority Schools Grant Program.  Together, these two programs alone pumped millions of dollars into California Schools, and many schools tapped these funds to purchase technology in the form of laptops, projectors and “smart” technology.  Projectors and speaker systems were mounted in classroom ceilings and control panels patched into walls.  The “modern classroom” was born—for the moment.

But as we look back almost a decade, what do we have in classroom technology? And what should we do next?

Well, what we have is a lot of teachers equipped with the ability to present content with their laptops.  We have content available in many places.  And we have a majority of teachers who have expertise in one area: using an interactive whiteboard as an overhead projector.

Coming from a district of over 70,000, I have seen numerous elementary classrooms where teachers teach with their laptops.  While there are certainly some gems among the rocks, most teachers I observe use slideshows they download from the web or those created by central office instructional personnel.  While this is a vast improvement over 2001 and overhead transparencies, it’s not the most effective use of the technology. In fact, one could argue downloading these ready-made materials has made teachers less involved in the cognitive planning of their instruction.  (I can’t tell you how many times I heard a teacher saying, “Oops, wasn’t expecting that, ha, ha” when an unanticipated slide pops up.)

What do we do to address this, to enhance the instructional experience for our students, to tap into their world of smart phones and iPads?  What we didn’t do in the last decade!
Train the teachers in the right tools.  I’m sorry, but SmartBoard is not it.

All teachers should be trained in and evaluated on their use of technology to teach.  Just projecting images with an interactive whiteboard or throwing up a presentation they didn’t create should not be deemed proficient.  Instead, we should see a movement towards these basic skills:

  1. Creating and manipulating graphical objects.
  2. Creating and manipulating text boxes.
  3. Using animation, especially the path animation in PowerPoint.
  4. Creating hyperlinks from PowerPoint to websites that support the learning.
  5. Accessing/inserting pictures and video into lesson materials.

Why these five?  Because if you are fluent in them, you can create almost any type of presentation. These five skills would give teachers a cornucopia of strategies that would grab student attention and make content more understandable.  Imagine the difference between reading a core selection with your class while linking in and out of websites connected to the subject.  Imagine creating live moving animations to stimulate student thinking about mundane number sense concepts.  Becoming proficient in these tools should be spelled out in the credentialing process more exactly, and should be the focus point for professional development it should have been back when all that equipment was purchased.

Technology and the Arts Merge

December 17th, 2011 by Lisa Marie Gonzales

Great news in recent weeks coming out of the Khan Academy. A grant of $5 million has been awarded to the Khan Academy to expand its creation of videos to include the arts and humanities.

Khan Academy began a few years ago when Salman Khan tried to create and send YouTube videos in order to tutor his cousin in math. His initial work on videos has developed into multimillion student uses every month, mostly in the STEM content areas (i.e. science, technology, engineering and math).

A grant from the O’Sullivan Foundation will enable the staff at the Academy to grow from one lesson producer to at least five full-time equivalent teachers. Appointed in the area to grow the arts are Dr. Steven Zucker and Dr. Beth Harris, who will oversee the production of content in the arts, history and the humanities. Zucker was the Chair of Art and Design History at Pratt Institute and Harris was Director of Digital Learning at the Museum of Modern Art in New York.

Zucker and Harris had previously partnered to create SmartHistory, a free and open, not-for-profit art history textbook.  Using multimedia to deliver unscripted conversations between art historians about the history of art, they sought to provide an alternative to the large, expensive art history textbook.

When I first visited the SmartHistory site, I was impressed with the user-friendly approach. I must say that, with my elementary background, the content may be a bit challenging for the elementary folks, but there is great promise at the middle, high and post-secondary levels.  SmartHistory currently contains some 436 pieces of artwork and 365 videos so far. Even though it was only recently launched, the site is averaging close to 170,000 hits per month.  The videos currently explore Ancient Cultures’ artwork from around 400 A.D. to the 1960’s Age of Post-Colonialism.

Some new videos that have been added include “A Venetian in Florence,” “Botticelli on Neo-Platonic Beauty,” and “The Gospel According to Donatello.”  (Okay, not being an art history aficionado, these are a bit over my head.)  Already, there is content here for a 15-week Western Culture course, complete with a course syllabus and tools for teaching with the images and videos.

The Skill of Describing” is a great example of what SmartHistory has to offer.  It is built around a series of questions that overlay a picture. The questions can easily guide a class discussion about how to observe a picture.  The questions really drill down and when examples are given of what could have been observed, it’s a great model for students to see how deep they can go with their observations and what they can really talk about. Better yet, the guidance it provides a teacher means that the teacher could watch the video, get some great ideas, and do the same leading discussion with a different piece of artwork.  This process could be adapted all the way down to kindergarten, exposing students to prominent pieces of art (like the Mona Lisa, Monet’s water lilies, The Scream, and Eric Carle’s spider).

Thanks, Khan Academy. I can’t wait to see the addition of more videos and how they are able to really enhance learning and bring the arts back into our schools!

Tech Equity: It’s not just for kids

November 28th, 2011 by Bob Price

Like most districts, we want our teachers to have access to powerful instructional technology.  And, like most districts, technology purchases for us have been made with a mix of limited district funds, some grants, and site categorical funds.  This has led to a situation where there are haves and have nots in terms of access to instructional technology.  A recent grant allowing for most of our math classes to have access to Promethean Boards caused our teachers of other subjects and grade levels to ask about access to these powerful technology tools.  When we took an inventory of the technological tools available to our teachers, we were surprised at the discrepancies across the district.  Our classrooms ran the gamut from full Promethean tools with document cameras to a single overhead projector sitting in a corner.  We realized we had a serious equity problem.

Our model of allowing sites to drive the educational technology available in classrooms had created a situation where student and teacher access technology varied dramatically.  A student could experience a relatively rich or embarrassingly poor access to technology tools depending on the luck of what teacher he/she was assigned to.  It was possible for students to spend their entire K-8 careers having only had access to teachers with an overhead projector.  Or they could be the lucky ones that had teachers with state-of-the-art technology.  This unacceptable situation led us to initiate our Tech Equity Project for teachers.

Utilizing a highly motivated Tech Vision Team, we developed minimum standards for technology for teachers.  After much discussion, it was decided that each classroom should be equipped with a teacher laptop, sound system, smart projector and document camera.  Funding for equipment would come from excess bond funds.  Sites agreed to pay for maintenance, repairs and supplies with the funds they were allocating previously to purchase hardware.  Our Tech Vision Team members offered to provide the necessary professional development at their sites in exchange for access to new technologies.  After much planning, meeting with vendors, and individual meetings with teachers and principals, our vision will be realized when teachers return from Winter break.

The next step in our vision will be the issue of equity of student access.  We have the same problem of haves and have nots with student technology.  Our goal will be to have all classrooms with an internet device available for all students within the next two years.  Whether that device will be a notebook, netbook, or tablet has yet to be decided.

The other big issue for us is whether our teachers will utilize all of this technology in powerful ways to improve student achievement.  One thing is certain.  No one will implement technology they do not have.  We are looking forward to the next steps in our journey.  Parent, teacher, and community support for our Tech Equity Initiative has been overwhelmingly positive.